Good news from the people at Analog magazine – the Campbell Award for New Writers is going to be renamed the Astounding Award. http://file770.com/campbell-name-removed-from-award/
A swift (in the end) change and a clever new name that connects the future of the award with its past.
The story is well covered elsewhere, so I’m off to look at the inevitable grumbling. And where better to find said grumbling than Brad Torgersen. In the wake of Jeannette Ng’s speech at the Hugo Awards, Brad declared:
“I was one of the very last Campbell Award nominees who actually respected the Campbell legacy. I was proud to hold a Hard SF flame aloft, in the woke murk of the (then new) decade.”
Brad Torgersen, Facebook 23 August
For Brad this was a matter of ‘erasure’, which is weird the more I think about it. Campbell doesn’t cease to exist when his name isn’t attached to an award. The same rhetoric was used when the World Fantasy Award dropped the weird H.P.Lovecraft bust as its award trophy. We were told that Lovecraft was being erased. Several years later and there doesn’t seem to be any drop-off in discussion about H.P.Lovecraft. Far from being erased, work about or inspired by Lovecraft is as prevalent as ever — what had already changed was HOW people talked about and looked at his ‘legacy’.
John W Campbell isn’t being erased either. Frankly, if the only way you’d ever know that he ever existed was that an award had ‘Campbell’ attached to it then he would have already been erased. The award may as well have been named after a can of soup. Actual erasure is when people avoid the actual history of a person. A big part of this name change was the OPPOSITE of erasure and specifically Alec Nevala-Lee’s historical work Astounding that actually looked at Campbell’s legacy.
Brad has added a comment to his earlier post as a reaction to the news:
“This was inevitable. After they trashed the World Fantasy Award (hating on Lovecraft) it was only a matter of time before they came for Campbell. No old white dead men shall survive the Great Wokeness of these sorry, silly decades. Heinlein was right. It’s the Crazy Years.”
Now Brad says some silly things but even he isn’t so poor at structuring thought to really think that Campbell now just vanishes in a puff of wokeness. In fact, looking over Brad’s own posts about Campbell it’s also clear that all he presents about Campbell is a very vague idea. It’s about ‘legacy’ and traditions and hand-waving around something. It’s very much not about the man himself. Campbell simply is a marker.
For Brad having Campbell’s name on an award was no more and no less than a territorial mark. The removal of the mark is an affront because it is a loss of territory. The only question is who does he think this imaginary territory belongs to?
45 responses to “For some it is about marking territory”
Given Brad’s minimal knowledge of the history of science fiction, and his apparently extremely limited reading of the works of the era that he keeps hearkening back to, the fact that he has only a vague handwavy notion of what Campbell was actually like is unsurprising. Frankly, it would shock me if Brad has read more than one or two of Campbell’s actual stories. I also have significant doubts as to whether he has actually read any of Campbell’s infamous editorials.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Brad’s knowledge of the history of SF is well-matched to his belief that what he writes is Hard SF.
LikeLiked by 4 people
Brad would need to have a better grasp of actual science to be able to write “hard SF”. I recall reading one of his stories where he confused velocity for acceleration. I also recall another where he massively miscalculated the fuel mass for a starship, and when someone pointed this out his response was “I don’t have enough time to bother with getting the details right”.
Brad may think he writes “hard SF”, but he seems to be too ignorant and lazy to actually do that.
LikeLiked by 4 people
Mind you ‘hard sf’ is often like that – only some facts matter
LikeLiked by 2 people
@Aaron —
“Brad may think he writes “hard SF”, but he seems to be too ignorant and lazy to actually do that.”
Hey, at least he didn’t have a spacefaring character being worried that his skull was going to be crushed by vacuum, as JDA did. 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
Quite possibly some people confuse hard SF with SF about hard men making hard decisions.
LikeLiked by 2 people
The hero Heinlein took the time to get that orbital maths right, and he didn’t even have computers to help him. Shouldn’t his self-appointed successors emulate him?
LikeLiked by 2 people
Totally agree! Also his editorials, and other (less famous) stories he had edited are really something.
He has the “idea” of these magazines, I don’t believe he had hold one in his hand ever.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Clarification for my sleepy utterings:
1st “His”: Campbell.
2nd “His”: Torgersen.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I love the new name, and I love the new World Fantasy trophy. Both are improvements and better fits for what their awards honor, regardless of what you think of Campbell or Lovecraft.
(Recently there were two sister websites named LoveKnitting and LoveCrochet which were combined and renamed LoveCrafts. So now I keep expecting to see nothing but patterns for Cthulhu toys and like items there. Can’t say I’m a fan of that name change.)
LikeLiked by 2 people
I would be totally chuffed about a Shub-Niggurath patterned sweater.
LikeLiked by 2 people
😀 Yeah, that would be amazing! And I’m sure there are some Lovecraft themed things there — they sell patterns from independent designers. But I can’t help but wonder if anyone thought about H.P. when they chose the name.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It was… entertaining?… to watch that guy who stopped by at File 770 to complain about “erasing” history, and the way several people calmly tried to explain to him exactly what you said – that if you keep the name or the statue and insist the history doesn’t matter, *that* is erasure – with each of them sharing examples like “I grew up not knowing anything about the history behind the name of such-and-such thing, but then when people campaigned to change the name of the thing, that’s how I learned the history.” And this guy was like: “You may have a point… but, then again, think about this! I grew up not knowing anything about the history behind the name of such-and-such thing, but then when people campaigned to change the name of the thing, that’s how I learned the history!” In other words, the same exact point they had made, but not recognized by him as such. I haven’t seen such a pure failure of reading comprehension in some time.
LikeLiked by 5 people
I often wonder how many people realize that the Hugos have a real person’s name.
LikeLiked by 2 people
One more as of now!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Congratulations on being one of today’s lucky 10,000! My work here is done! 🙂
LikeLiked by 3 people
I don’t think they’d count Hugo Gernsback on account of his being… the wrong sort of white guy, to their thinking.
(With that said, Hugo does have his own issues, being inordinately fond of dealing with funding problems for his magazines by avoiding paying his authors, which reached the point that at one point Clark Ashton Smith and HP Lovecraft had to hire a lawyer and take him to court to get him to pay.)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well, Brad answered that question, didn’t he? Whether or not he meant to.
“No old dead white men will survive.”
The real question is why should he think SF (and fantasy/horror, re: Lovecraft) should belong to said old dead white men?
LikeLiked by 7 people
Surviving is a pretty neat trick when you’re dead, independent of whether you’re old or white. Of course, in horror you have to worry about those old guys clawing their way out of their graves and coming after you.
LikeLiked by 4 people
Brad is accidentally right. These are the crazy years. It’s just who’s causing them that he’s a little confused about.
Quoth Camestros The only question is who does he think this imaginary territory belongs to?
The obvious answer is: Himself, and his fellow white, right-wing ‘hard’ male writers. Sterile. Male. White. Exalting in the ambitions of imperialists and colonisers, settlers and industrialists.To Brad, those are the only people qualified to own the territory. All the rest of us are mere interlopers who must be punished if we dare to claim that we belong here too.
And of course it’s so entertaining to see him impotently ranting at the sky, unable to change even the slightest bit of the way SF is evolving and leaving him behind.
LikeLiked by 4 people
Now Brad says some silly things but even he isn’t so poor at structuring thought to really think that Campbell now just vanishes in a puff of wokeness.
You have a far higher opinion of his intelligence than I do, sir!
LikeLiked by 2 people
“We’ve lost power!”
“What power?”
“Old dead white man power!”
“Is that a thing? Because they still have plenty of them in school curriculum.”
“All old dead white men must be revered!”
“Even the liberal ones?”
“Um, no, not the liberal ones.”
“Astounding Magazine was full of old dead white man writers and editors, so now the name honors all of them instead of just one of them.”
…..
“Old dead white man power lives!”
“There you go.”
LikeLiked by 5 people
“I was one of the very last Campbell Award nominees who actually respected the Campbell legacy.”
That’s a bit of a slam against Brad’s own SP nominees for the Astounding, isn’t it?
Mind you, Brad chose to deliberately keep out Andy Weir in his first year of eligibility despite him being a great example of what Brad claimed to want, so it’s not like he’s well-known for his consistency. Luckily Weir got through next year, of course.
LikeLiked by 6 people
Yup
LikeLike
Perhaps he should be pushing the Dragons to name their categories in honour of these authors: the Campbell Award for Science Fiction, the Lovecraft Award for Horror etc. Two birds with one stone – the authors’ legacies are preserved, and the Dragons’ SEO problems are fixed.
LikeLiked by 3 people
…The Larry award for Fantasy (non-fiction section, of course…)
LikeLiked by 1 person
I would have suggested “…For Alternative History”…
LikeLiked by 5 people
Much better 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
The Ingalls Wilder Award for Best Media Tie-In Novel.
LikeLiked by 4 people
He is jealous that he missed the time when men like Campbell would give give mediocre White male writers, like himself, opportunities at the expense of everyone else.
I wonder how many careers Campbell stymied due to his racism. Or how many great writers turned to other genres because they didn’t feel welcome. Of course, Brad doesn’t give a shit about them.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I tend to think Torgersen is following the Campbellian tradition in his take on life too, avoiding all social nuances for a hard take on reality from a black and white technological perspective. I mean, his talk about “hating on Lovecraft”.
Heck, I *love* Lovecraft. I wrote fan fiction in school. Played Call of Cthulhu. Searched with my friends for all movies based on his works. Read all the books. The biographies. I once had a friend calling me from Syria, enthusiastically shouting that he had found a temple to Dagon. Then we chanted “Ia! Ia! Ftaghn!” over the phone while he sacrificed a cheese sandwich (I think it was). The joy his works and all the derivates has given me is astounding (see what I did there). But even though I love Lovecraft, I still do not think his bust was fitting trophy for the “World Fantasy Award”. And the new trophy is gorgeous. I do admitt that I might have been more reluctant to change it if it had been a horror award.
And this is where Torgersen runs into a wall, because from his Campbellian Perspective, things are mutually exclusive. Love-Hate doesn’t exist. You can’t love Lovecrafts work and importance if you also hate is racism. You can’t hold the Cthulhu Mythos in high regard if you don’t think Lovecraft is the best fit for a trophy for a Fantasy Award. It is either or.
LikeLiked by 4 people
Yup, you can also like both hard SF and fantasy like Jeannette Ng’s (and everything in between that the Best New Writer winners/finalists represent over the years). Actually, Ng’s novel isn’t so un-Campbellian if you realize the scientific detail that went into the pendulum sun itself.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Plus Campbell was also the editor of “Unknown” Magazine, where ‘Under the Pendulum Sun’ would have fit right in, but again, we’re dealing Campbell the Eidolon, not Campbell the Actual Person…
LikeLiked by 3 people
Thanks for that link to Jeannette Ng’s essay Laura. A nice insight into her process.
I’m only physics adjacent myself, but have done similar calculations for fun in my youth
LikeLiked by 2 people
In addition to everything else, I’m darkly amused that people claim that Campbell is being “erased” or whatever when we’re still regularly giving him Retro Hugo Awards.
LikeLiked by 2 people
And yet he went out of his way so he wouldn’t have to wear the Campbell* diadem should he win…
* Does the regalia continue under the Astounding Award?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I would guess so… isn’t that a custom started by the winners themselves? How did Brad try to avoid the tiara? That’s no fun. Guess he’s not manly enough. I love that David Anthony Durham’s picture wearing it has been on the Writertopia page for the award for ages.
(I see the Wikipedia page has been updated with the new name.)
LikeLiked by 1 person
He was going to wear his military uniform which means he couldn’t wear a tiara because of reasons rather than just say ‘I don’t want to wear a tiara’
LikeLiked by 1 person
” The dude is GOOD. And most importantly, I’d vote for him mostly because since Brad is also a Warrant Officer in the US Army, he’d accept the award in his uniform, which means that he’d refuse to wear that stupid Campbell tiara.” http://monsterhunternation.com/2012/02/23/how-you-can-make-a-difference-getting-me-nominated-for-a-hugo/
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ah, thanks for the explanation. In that case, I can see him wanting to wear his uniform not simply to avoid the tiara–but probably still a fringe benefit in his eyes.
Did Jeanette ever add the tiara to her peacock hat?
LikeLike
Surely being a pissy little baby about some headgear is an infinitely worse look than wearing it and poking a bit of fun at yourself about it. Lucky he didn’t win, thus avoiding the situation altogether.
LikeLiked by 1 person
How would he have coped with the funny hats worn by winners at the Hugo Losers’ Party? What a joyless prick!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Poor guy would have had to keep explaining military uniform protocol to people all night! 😛 Did they do funny winner’s hats at the Hugo Losers’ Party before GRRM started hosting his own again?
LikeLiked by 1 person
No idea. I only attended one Hugo Losers’ party, namely this year’s.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Laura, the tiara wasn’t there- I’m sure Jeannette will get it at some point. Lavie Tidhar has it, AFAIK, and since he lives in israel, it’s been difficult. I believe they did.
LikeLiked by 2 people