Not actually grapefruit flavoured but it did have a fruity taste.
Not actually grapefruit flavoured but it did have a fruity taste.
I do like an over elaborate fantasy magic system where powers (and the characters of the people deploying them) are tied to some other phenomenon or system of classification. Of course elements and colours and everything has been done but what about…potato crisp (aka chip) flavours? No, I thought not.
I’ve found many articles on crisps and crisp flavours but not a good one that is simple timeline of the classic UK flavours of potato crisps specifically (i.e. not including flavours of other related snack foods like pickled onion monster munch). The emphasis is either the early history or on novelty flavours.
In the UK the colour coding of packet to flavour is an issue also. There are canonical colours but infamously one of the biggest manufacturers of crisps in the UK, Walkers, use non-standard colours. The colours in Australia are different as well and in some cases I can no longer remember.
So I’m going off my shaky recall of what I think is canon circa late 1970s England.
Salted (or to be precise “Ready Salted”) is the ur-flavour and the basis of all other variants. Historically, the flavour approach had an immediate schism. Cheese & Onion was devised by Taytos in Ireland and Smiths responded with Salt & Vinegar. The names indicate the two approaches to crisp flavours (and related snacks in general:
Beef flavour and BBQ flavour represent a subset of flavours that include other variants such as “Oxo” and “Bovril” flavours. The core flavour is pretty much the same but it crosses the condiment/meal boundary and hence is more ecumenical in this scheme.
What powers go with which?
As can be seen from reality, the system allows for infinite variation without ever actually doing anything very different…just like lots of fantasy magic systems!
I had been keen to see this film since the first review I’d read of it but if it ever had an Australian release I never saw it advertised. Written and directed by Boots Riley, the film follows it’s own pace and heads off in its own direction with all the confidence of a disturbing nightmare…but funny. It’s hard to describe the film without revealing aspects of the plot, which won’t spoil the film exactly but may undermine the impact.
The initial premise of the film is not a great help in getting a sense of what the film is like but it is a start. Cassius Green (played by an increasingly bewildered LaKieth Stanfield) is looking for a job. Unemployed and living in the garage of his uncle (Terry Crews), he fakes his CV for a job with a telemarketing company. The manager at the company sees through the deception but gives Cassius the job anyway.
Initially Cassius finds the work dispiriting, partly because of the low pay but also because of the intrusive nature of the work — shown visually by having him appear at his desk in people’s living rooms while they are trying to eat breakfast, mourn or have sex. However, his ability to sell things over the phone is transformed when an older man (Danny Glover) teaches him how to use his “white voice”. This isn’t a mere change in register but a whole new voice (provided by David Cross). With this new voice, Cassius’s life changes utterly, eventually leading him into the fabulously wealthy Wolf-of-Wall Street like world of the “power sellers” on the floor above.
Meanwhile, a fellow telemarketer at RegalView called Squeeze (Steven Yeun) is attempting to unionise the workforce and organise a strike, Cassius’s girlfriend Detroit (Tessa Thompson) is attempting to launch her art exhibition, and obnoxious TechBro Steve Lift (Armie Hammer) has plans to change the very concept of work and employment.
Set in a world that isn’t quite ours, the film rests on slow humour and visual gags to weave a disturbing social satire. Everything is off balance, including the script and the story directions. Familiar images and settings only add to the constant unsettled feeling. On television the only show is “I Got the Shit Kicked Out of Me” and the adverts are all for “WorryFree”, Steve Lift’s modern day version of indentured servitude ‘disrupting’ the job market.
There are few laugh out loud gags and many surreal moments. The more science fictional elements become overt towards the end. The whole is something that has elements of Metropolis, Chaplin’s Modern Times, Peele’s Get Out with a dash of Philip K Dick paranoia. The ‘message’ is a simple observation that modern capitalism and the modern work place is dehumanizing us all and stripping people of their identities.
This isn’t a subtle film, except that the off kilter, spiraling plot carefully matches the central character’s own emotional journey. On the way the alienation from impostor syndrome, sudden wealth or viral-video notoriety are all touched on as the increasingly bloodied and disheveled Cassius discovers the world makes even less sense than he ever thought it did.
No major twists this week but the episode takes a similar pace as last week’s episode. This steadier pacing of episode is letting the actors play to the their strengths. Sonequa Martin-Green has always been one of the strongest assets of the show and has coped brilliantly with some of the absurd situations the script writers have thrown at Michael Burnham. This week she gets to deal with even more emotional trauma and less than stellar parenting when she meets her time-traveling mother. Even Spock appears moved and at least looks like he might think about shouldering some of the emotional labour that Michael’s two sets of parents have managed to dump upon her.
The wider plot is mainly a bunch of stuff that happens. I see in some other reviews (e.g. the Mary Sue review) that some saw this episode as a return to Season 1’s bad habits. I didn’t find that, if anything it looked more like an episode of a show that has a much better understanding of what it is: a set of flawed but deep people dealing with space nonsense played by a set of actors who really know how to convincingly carry that off.
Ash and Georgiou get their own side action as they get caught up in Section 31’s compromised situation with sinister future AI Control. Everything, of course, goes very badly for everybody but really, given the legitimate excuse of a time-travel plot, events actually had fewer holes than usual.
Only one substantial twist, and it’s not much of a spoiler, Red Angel/Michael’s Mum has no idea what the mysterious red signals are. So that particular plot mystery is re-instated.
Today I throw my body in the front of impending danger and take all the damage that would otherwise have inflected on you dear readers by eating thinly sliced starch covered in fats and salt. Specifically Smith’s Spag Bol flavoured “chips” (as they are uncouthly referred to in Australia*)
Disappointing really. I was hoping for a really strong tomato flavour but it was bit more generic smoky taste. I note that the packet says “contains milk or milk products” so at any moment I might be assaulted by one of the many gangs of roaming vegan vigilantes (or vegalantes as they are known) funded by shadowy sources (or perhaps shadowy sauces). Also the packet notes “contains soybeans of soybean products” which might enrage right wingers – thus putting these snacks in the radical centre. Gluten free though, so I’m not likely to angry any celiac street gangs.
The big story in Australia currently is the undercover video of senior members of the far right anti-immigration party One Nation attempting to gain money from pro-gun lobbyists. In a distinctly Australian twist, their defense has been that they were drunk at the time: https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/mar/26/one-nations-james-ashby-says-he-was-on-the-sauce-when-seeking-20m-from-nra
I was a bit wary of the story initially, as it was presented as a kind of video ‘sting’ operation. That sounded too reminiscent of the antics of James O’Keefe in the US whose MO is to create highly edited video of meetings with people form organisations that the right is targeting. However, there’s a lot more to the story.
An Australian journalist working for Al Jazeera spent three years undercover within the world of pro-gun campaigners. Rodger Muller established a fake Australian gun rights group and with little more than videos and a website became seen as a minor but important broker between US gun organisations and Australia. The full Al Jazeera story is here: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/03/sell-massacre-nra-playbook-revealed-190325111828105.html
Australian TV has been running the in-depth investigation over two nights on the ABC and it has been fascinating (part two is tonight). The political fallout is not large currently — One Nation didn’t receive any money and it appears that as far as their attempt at a deal with the NRA went it wasn’t sufficient to break electoral law. The scandal is unlikely to lose One Nation any votes but it is helping to denormalise the extremist party and it makes it harder for the Liberal Party to be seen to be co-operating with them. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/mar/27/pauline-hanson-to-take-action-over-james-ashby-and-steve-dickson-but-not-yet
Pauline Hanson herself, the unlikely personality at the heart of One Nation’s cult of personality, was also captured spreading conspiracy mongering about the infamous Port Arthur massacre — the 1996 mass shooting that led to Australia adopting stricter gun laws: https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/pauline-hanson-appears-to-question-port-arthur-massacre-in-video-20190327-p518a6.html
In the wake of the Christchurch murders, the issues of both guns and anti-immigrant extremism and Islamophobia have become more prominent in Australian politics. People are very aware that the shooter was an Australian but also that he could only access the weapons he used in New Zealand. The gun lobby in Australia is not high profile but they spend large amounts of money attempting to influence politicians to soften gun laws:
“Australians may be surprised to discover the gun lobby in Australia rivals the NRA in size and spending, according to Australia Institute research commissioned by Gun Control Australia.”https://www.smh.com.au/national/australia-s-gun-lobby-and-its-political-donations-laid-bare-20190327-p5184g.html
A key strategy is access to right wing minor parties who lack both cash and ethics. Such parties are unlikely to ever form government at either state or federal level but they often have a few seats in upper senate-like chambers of parliament (either state or federally) to either hold the balance of power or be influential in helping controversial legislation through.
Lastly, doubling back to question of journalist ethics, there’s a longer discussion about that aspect here: https://theconversation.com/did-al-jazeeras-undercover-investigation-into-one-nation-overstep-the-mark-114288
I haven’t written much about the Mueller report prior to this post (indeed pretty much nothing https://camestrosfelapton.wordpress.com/?s=Mueller ) and I liked Alexandra Erin’s analysis of all such investigation and thoughts about impeachment: the best option for getting rid of Trump is the next election and always has been. That doesn’t mean investigations or even possible impeachment proceedings shouldn’t occur — they are a key part of the checks and balances in America’s system of government and they slowdown and interrupt the full scope of the harm the current administration might cause.
The reaction from the Whitehouse to the as yet unreleased report has been one of claiming that it vindicates or exonerates Trump. You don’t need to be particularly anti-Trump or even particularly anti-conservative to regard that analysis with some scepticism. The investigation already result in action against key figures in Trump’s campaign that anybody, regardless of their politics, should find concerning. Politician’s spin.
So it is fascinating to see Larry Correia’s and Brad Torgersen’s reaction to the report — which note, they haven’t read or seen. Brad and Larry are of particular interest as they were ostensibly anti-Trump at the time of the nomination and were far more reluctant to be seen as endorsing him, presenting their positions as more anti-left or anti-Hillary Clinton than pro-Trump. So. swallowing a politician’s narrative hook, line and sinker is an interesting shift for both of them. Here’s Brad on Facebook:
“Hate Trump for being a loud, uncouth, ill-prepared, boastful, otherwise un-Presidential oaf. Fine. But he was never in Russia’s pocket. In fact, the big red arrows kept aiming back at Clinton, Inc. and also Obama, Inc.”Facebook Post
And a similar sentiment from Larry Correia:
“Oh well. That’s what you get for pinning all your hopes and dreams on something that was obviously a crock of shit to anybody who gave it a few seconds of critical thinking. There’s plenty of legitimate reasons to hate any politician without straw grasping for silly made up ones.”Facebook Post
Both Brad and Larry talk a lot about narratives when it comes to politics but in that special projection/reversal of position way where they say their opponents are doing the thing that they are trying very hard to do. In this case attempting to frame a conclusion about the report before they have any idea what the actual content of the report is. It’s interesting because in both cases they are committing strongly to a pro-Trump framing i.e. accepting the uncritically the spin from the Whitehouse without engaging any critical gears at all. Heck even waiting a few days might have been a bit smarter given they still don’t know what is actually in the report.
It’s weird because I’m now a bit more interested in what the report says. Again, it was unlikely to ever have a smoking gun of, say, live video of Vladimir Putin handing wads of money to a pre-election Trump and Trump saying “Gee thanks for the money Vlad, I’ll spend this on doing all the crimes.” However, given there has already been, what, seven (?) prosecutions and four guilty pleas as a consequence of the investigation, it’s an already established fact that the Trump campaign was mired in criminal behaviour.
It’s going to be interesting to see how this pans out. Both Larry and Brad adopt a stance of being different from the more overtly nationalist and pro-Trump right but often repeat and advance talking points and propaganda from the nationalist right uncritically. I’ll be interested to see to what extent they’ll back pedal on this topic as the story shifts.
[Scene: The former Bortsworth Tea Room which has recently been refurbished as the BEAN!BEAN!BOOM! Coffee Salon. Timothy the Talking Cat is putting the finishing touches to his latest masterpiece.]
[Barista] Here you go, your single-origin extra-froth lactose-free frappelatteccino with fish pellet sprinkles.
[Timothy] Than you my good sir, could you please decant it into this saucer?
[Barista] Of course! [pours the beverage onto an oversized dinner plate with ‘World’s Best Mom’ written on it. As he does so the barista notes Timothy’s paperwork scattered around the artfully distressed recycled timber table top] Ohh, are you a writer?
[Timothy] Not merely a writer. I am an editor, publisher and public intellectual. However, I find that at times I must ground myself within the literary arts to commune with my muse and once again connect with the deep springs of creativity.
[Barista] And you use crayon?
[Timothy] Black crayon for regular words, blue for hyperlinks and this bad boy [holds up a red crayon] for drawing squiggly lines under spelling mistakes.
[Barista] And the green crayon?
[Timothy] Level three headings in outline view: sans-serif italic pt 16 Green.
[Barista] Nice. Do you have many of those?
[Timothy] Mainly in space battles when explaining which missiles hit which ship.
[Barista] Science fiction?
[Timothy] Regency Romance.
[Timothy] Indeed. Steve Austin’s literary works are second only to his career as a surprisingly cheaply made 1970s cyborg superhero.
[Just then the front door of BEAN!BEAN!BOOM! busrts open and in strides a burly man in a law enforcement uniform and mirror shades.]
[Generic coffee shop customer] Scarper! It’s the genre police!
[Several over caffeinated writers who have been exploiting the free wi-fi slap their chrome books shut and make for the back exit. Only to be confronted by a second officer even bigger and burlier than the first.]
[Cop 1] Freeze you no-good hacks. We’ve got a call about serious genre infringement in this bordello of bad writing. I should drag all of you no good KU-junkies down to the holding cells until you confess your crimes but my partner doesn’t what me to get written up AGAIN for unnecessary brutality against the literary profession.
[Cop 2] Yeah. I hates the paperwork. [He picks a toothpick off the counter, chews it slightly and then grabs a few more and just crunches down on them, finally swallows them as a big splintery mass.]
[Cop 1] So if you all co-operate and turn over the miscreant we can be on our way and leave you to you…”activities”.
[As one, all of the writers in the coffee shop point at Timothy.]
[Timothy] Oh! The nerve of it! Just because I published that op-ed saying that ‘authors are lazy scum and frankly my publishing house would be better off without them’, is no reason for you all to betray me! What happened to reasoned debate and a frank but fair difference of opinion!
[Cop 1, striding over] Let’s have a look see, shall we? Hmm, space battles, stately homes, marriage proposals? Let me guess…Regency Romance/Space Opera?
[Timothy] Yes and that’s a perfectly valid sub-sub-sub-category. Look, here is my Amazon licence which authorises me to author in said sub-sub-sub-category.
[Cop 1] But what’s THIS? [Cop 1 holds up a frappelatteccino stained ruled A4 writing pad marked “Detective Bob interrogates his first witness in the drawing room.”
[Timothy] What about it? Detective Bob LIKES drawing when he investigates.
[Cop 1] But did you SIGNAL?
[Cop 1] SIGGGGG- NALLLL
[Timothy] Signal what!
[Cop 1] Signal that you Regency Romance/Space Opera would make a sharp left turn into Regency Romance/Sci-Fi Cozy Mystery?
[Timothy] It was just one chapter!
[Cop 1 getting right in Timothy’s face and stabbing his big cop finger into the A4 writing pad] That. Only. Makes. It. Worse.
[Cop 1 addressing the room] We live in chaotic times people. Lawless times. Good people want rules, order, predictability. You know what happens when they DON’T get predictability?
[Cop 2] Anarchy.
[Cop 1] That’s right. Anarchy. We have genre categories for a reason people. We have them so good hard working folk, who just want to consume hastily written fiction can FIND what they hanker for without any nasty surprises.
[Cop 2] Good folk, like my mom.
[Cop 1] That’s right, like his mom. We only ask ONE thing from you scum, you worthless monsters. We just ask ONE thing, that you SIGNAL YOUR GENRE and that once signalled you cleave strictly to the tropes of your genre never ONCE wavering from the correct path.
[Cop 2] Not asking a lot.
[Cop 1] Not asking a lot at all. You just need to have your cover CORRECT and your tropes IN LINE and we’ll leave you alone. But if you don’t…
[Cop 2]…if you don’t….
[Cop 1]…oh boy, if you DON’T then…
[Timothy] THEN WHAT! WHAT WILL YOU DO! I’M TOO FELINE TO GO TO PRISON AND BE ADOPTED AS A PRISON CAT AND CHARM THE WARDEN AND HELP THE INMATES RECONNECT WITH THEIR SENSITIVE SIDE ENABLING THEM TO LIVE PRODUCTIVE LIVES AFTER THEY GET PAROLE!
[Cop 1] Then we will WRITE VERY MEAN THINGS ABOUT YOU ON OUR DEPARTMENT FACEBOOK PAGE!
[Cop 1] I knew you’d hate that.
[Timothy] What? No, I was just reading a line of dialogue from when Detective Bob interrogates Chiseled McEdifice.
[Cop 1] Wait? Are you the cat who writes Chiseled McEdifice?
[Timothy beam proudly] The one and only.
[Cop 2] He’s our favourite!
[Cop 1] In that case we’ll let you go with a warning.
[Just then the actual Bortsworth Police arrive and arrest Cop 1 and Cop 2 for unnecessary boot kicking of a front door]
Two beers in one photo as I have to drown my sorrows after the NSW election.