Puppies and Hugos

On to specifics. Recently I’ve been finding myself commenting more on the Internet. The specific cause of my increased level of web-based verbiage has been the kerfuffle over Hugo Awards. As some of my comments at various places (e.g. here http://file770.com/?p=22634 and here http://www.philipsandifer.com/2015/04/guided-by-beauty-of-their-weapons.html ) were getting into blog-post level themselves, I thought it best if I wrote less on other people’s blogs and wrote more somewhere else. That way I can could point to what I wrote and say “this”.

Some background for anybody who comes here unfamiliar with the brouhaha.

The Hugo Awards are given every year to various works in science-fiction and fantasy. While they resemble other literary awards they are somewhat unusual. Instead of being decided by a panel of judges, the awards are actually associated with an annual fan convention WorldCon. Members firstly nominate (some months before) and then vote on the shortlist of nominees.

Recently there has been a backlash by some active writers who felt the awards were cliquish and too leftwing. This backlash took the form of a campaign called “Sad Puppies”. This year the campaign was joined by a more assertive campaign called “Rabid Puppies”. Both campaigns put forward slates of nominees that, for one reason or another, ended up dominating the final set of nominees…

Further reading:

https://bradrtorgersen.wordpress.com/2015/02/01/sad-puppies-3-the-2015-hugo-slate/

http://io9.com/the-hugo-awards-were-always-political-now-theyre-only-1695721604

http://www.philipsandifer.com/2015/04/guided-by-beauty-of-their-weapons.html

Advertisements

19 comments

  1. Pingback: A short post about Aristotle | Camestros Felapton
  2. Pingback: On the systematic evaluation of creative works of science fiction: part the second | Camestros Felapton
  3. Pingback: The Sandifer-Day Debate | Camestros Felapton
  4. Pingback: A rant about puppies born of frustration | Camestros Felapton
  5. Pingback: Puppy reaction to Sandifer v Day | Camestros Felapton
  6. Pingback: The Hugos: why even bother? | Camestros Felapton
  7. Pingback: Collected wanderings: a not the puppy non-round up | Camestros Felapton
  8. Pingback: Evil SJW Message Fiction! A cat reviews The Hot Equations | Camestros Felapton
  9. Pingback: More Rabid nastiness | Camestros Felapton
  10. Pingback: The Unified Puppy Theory | Camestros Felapton
  11. Pingback: Let’s talk about puppy poo: [Updated] | Camestros Felapton
  12. Pingback: Unified puppy theory: confirmation | Camestros Felapton
  13. Pingback: Diversity of belief | Camestros Felapton
  14. Pingback: Unfeasible Tales of Social Justice Fantasy Science! | Camestros Felapton
  15. Pingback: What am I’m reading: The Golden Age by John C Wright | Camestros Felapton
  16. Pingback: The 2015 Puppy Kerfuffle and its impact on Best Related Work in 2016 | Camestros Felapton
  17. Pingback: The Brad Torgersen guide to voting for Toni Weisskopf | Camestros Felapton
  18. Pingback: Vox Day – Probably not a psycho/sociopath | Camestros Felapton
  19. Pingback: The EPH Analysis | Camestros Felapton